The use of the word "would" within investigative interviews or criminal interrogations is an easy way for a possible suspect to avoid commitment to his or her specific actions. Unfortunately, we are often conditioned to accept this as a denial of a specific act, without realizing it, thereby allowing the individual to slip through the cracks. Our job as competent interviewers is to "fill the cracks" so the guilty individuals don't slip through, and so the innocent individuals are not wrongfully accused of something they didn't do.
To read more about the use of generalizing statements in interviews and interrogation click the link below!
Click HERE
For more info, check out the Interview and Interrogation Group at http://www.lies.igroops.com/
Wesley Clark
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment